From nobody Mon Jan 8 16:30:58 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4T801S4TTqz56GQH for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 16:31:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from www121.sakura.ne.jp (www121.sakura.ne.jp [153.125.133.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4T801R5jT2z4Y3w for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 16:31:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from kalamity.joker.local (123-1-22-158.area1b.commufa.jp [123.1.22.158]) (authenticated bits=0) by www121.sakura.ne.jp (8.17.1/8.17.1/[SAKURA-WEB]/20201212) with ESMTPA id 408GUx9k002393; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 01:30:59 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 01:30:58 +0900 From: Tomoaki AOKI To: Warner Losh Cc: Christian Weisgerber , FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: Move u2f-devd into base? Message-Id: <20240109013058.22807f3816603829316cef4c@dec.sakura.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Junchoon corps X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd14.0) List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4T801R5jT2z4Y3w X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7684, ipnet:153.125.128.0/18, country:JP] On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 08:18:38 -0700 Warner Losh wrote: > On Mon, Jan 8, 2024, 7:55〓AM Christian Weisgerber > wrote: > > > We have FIDO/U2F support for SSH in base. > > > > We also have a group "u2f", 116, in the default /etc/group file. > > > > Why do we keep the devd configuration (to chgrp the device nodes) > > in a port, security/u2f-devd? Can't we just add this to base, too? > > It's just another devd configuration file. > > > > This properly belongs to devfs.conf no? Otherwise it's a race... > > Warner > > -- > > Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de It's devd.conf materials. It actually is security/usf-devd/files u2f.conf and its contents is sets of notify 100 { match "vendor" ... match "product" ... action "chgrpy u2f ..." };. Some hase more items in it, though. So it should be in ports to adapt for latest products more quickly than in base, I think. -- Tomoaki AOKI