From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed May 10 04:10:27 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id EAA17245
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 10 May 1995 04:10:27 -0700
Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id EAA17239
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 10 May 1995 04:10:23 -0700
Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA13625
  (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Wed, 10 May 1995 05:51:37 -0500
Received: by bonkers.taronga.com (smail2.5p) id AA05515; 10 May 95 05:51:00 CDT (Wed)
Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id FAA05512; Wed, 10 May 1995 05:50:59 -0500
From: Peter da Silva <peter@bonkers.taronga.com>
Message-Id: <199505101050.FAA05512@bonkers.taronga.com>
Subject: Re: This one looks very very suspecious to me....
To: moore@WOLFE.net (Timothy Moore)
Date: Wed, 10 May 1995 05:50:59 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: obrien@leonardo.net, bakul@netcom.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199505100331.UAA08835@gonzo.wolfe.net> from "Timothy Moore" at May 9, 95 08:31:51 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 281       
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Like it or not, it's legal ANSI C behavior for the preprocessor to
> tokenize its input.  If you want a macro preprocesor, use m4 =:O
> (ducks)

What the hell is wrong with m4? Why do people keep encouraging the use of
CPP for general macro processing when m4 is so much better?