From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 7 17:10:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EBDC16A423 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 17:10:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com) Received: from web32715.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web32715.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CEDD843D48 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 17:09:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 29548 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Mar 2006 17:09:59 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XXJ60OP5/JKdYriXYo0mVWwIhkpGISHqTuZtZVsdH4QPwyT9UmTInZ6azvayTc5VN+AfYzhI0T6M+cAfmHwI97pYfuH6BsLOW1mrqR8tVWqpUvsEvhYhGKqtttHxWX43XdP/rJ3jgguolVOVKpSIiDubXE+YsfBSVcamjs/tzjg= ; Message-ID: <20060307170959.29546.qmail@web32715.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.118.66.85] by web32715.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 07 Mar 2006 18:09:59 CET Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 18:09:59 +0100 (CET) From: To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20060307162753.GC64610@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/91293: [svr4] [patch] *Experimental* Update to the SVR4 emulation (from NetBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 17:10:00 -0000 --- Kris Kennaway ha scritto: ... > > > > What is left on the patch at this point are only bug fixes to panics and > > overflows from the NetBSD port. This is not something I can test on amd64 > and > > rebuilding a kernel on qemu is painfully slow. > > Unfortunately this makes it unlikely anyone will commit your fixes, > since they're untested. > They are tested... on NetBSD. In any case it's not easy to find an application that will exercise a buffer overflow or a fix in sysconf. I'm actually in no hurry for getting them committed, I'm satisfied that there IS a patch and someone wanting to work on this will find it easier to catch on. That said, I will probably try reinstalling 1386 in the future. cheers, Pedro. ___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it