From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb 10 00:21:26 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D749F2A
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:21:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-oa0-x22a.google.com (mail-oa0-x22a.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22a])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC20D171B
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:21:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id i7so6790995oag.1
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 16:21:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
 bh=YaIm0UIT5y/dDQuuLVXQMoQVuyzoJ3Ux7CQbSQpT8ek=;
 b=W5bpbdif+LaPf95Eqk7OtJXjy11rJijRuGamCUC44BWkthwSxKYyjreLRUIG2enMEX
 Mrnf85hIY5/1cvfhIyzhPXE3BB7UAqqoJKAVugZ6ioOBRWNJtnK2Na2DBT5FHb59jnyD
 ocGCGMhmqP6ON35imcI03WrfaNMWTdVp9LANxoAstw0Cc75LuJQCM0fljCkJGYNpxmr2
 gCp7gKsybet0PRQ/on5UhtBhGlWbWcvIE3uNSv+aDsDNcN8IIvUdua9MWV+ESJqyGFST
 T40Vrz/ijKDRuuOK0PXUegxy9MN4ZGh8hiVHQeQRagH81Jp+nBN4aKZGTyk6/YBmipOh
 XOkw==
X-Received: by 10.182.233.201 with SMTP id ty9mr10209834obc.29.1391991685217; 
 Sun, 09 Feb 2014 16:21:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.61.7 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 16:21:05 -0800 (PST)
From: Raimundo Santos <raitech@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 22:21:05 -0200
Message-ID: <CAGQ6iC-O50Kj0DfhBDrEsYL=GrC2-8GgK=qR+dcy2VWNx6zmog@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: vnet + netmap: how is it possible?
To: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:21:26 -0000

Hello list!

I am willing to test an idea: modularize network functions using vnet
jails. One vnet jail do the NAT, other do balancing, another one the
traffic shapping, and so on.

And I wonder if netmap could help to interconnect these vnets, because I
can not see a way to do this. May be using netgraph or epair? But any of
these options are not netmap aware, are they?

Well, the question is in the air!

Thank you all,
Raimundo