From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 12 09:18:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA71106566B for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:18:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) Received: from ftp.translate.ru (ftp.translate.ru [80.249.188.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683CF8FC15 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:18:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (89.112.15.178.pppoe.eltel.net [89.112.15.178]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by ftp.translate.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DED0F13DF62; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:18:02 +0300 (MSK) Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:18:00 +0300 From: Lev Serebryakov X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <7010235325.20110112121800@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: sthaug@nethelp.no In-Reply-To: <20110112.101414.41710948.sthaug@nethelp.no> References: <98602823.20110111225049@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20110111220314.GZ39356@cicely7.cicely.de> <165642603.20110112115208@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20110112.101414.41710948.sthaug@nethelp.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, ticso@cicely7.cicely.de, artem@aws-net.org.ua, ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: Juniper e3k with ports limitied to 100Mbit and re NICs on MSI MoBo: problems with duplex negotiation (Hetzner host provider discard FreeBSD support due this bug) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:18:04 -0000 Hello, Sthaug. You wrote 12 =FF=ED=E2=E0=F0=FF 2011 =E3., 12:14:14: > Manual configuration of FD for 100 Mbps is not in violation of the > standards. What the standards say (for 100 Mbps) is that *if* you have > one end configured for autonegotiation *and* the other end is manually > configured for full duplex, the autoneg end should end up as half duplex > (with the inevitable errors as a result). This may be counterintuitive, > but it's the way the standard is written. Ok, and according to output of Linux's tools, autonegotiation is disabled on port, and full-duplex is set manually. And FreeBSD ignmore manual settings for re(4)/regphy(4) adapters. Here is a problem :( > For Gigabit Ethernet autonegotiation is *required* by the standard, as > other people already have pointed out. Yes, and it works, but cost additional money, which is comparable to price of server itself :( --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov