From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Wed Sep 2 13:08:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DFAD9C7D80 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 13:08:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE7DB3E4 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 13:08:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t82D8Smj041821 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 13:08:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 202811] FreeBSD can't boot on UEFI with AMD hardware Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 13:08:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: emaste@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 13:08:29 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202811 --- Comment #4 from Ed Maste --- > I would like to do such but there isn't any uefi image at the folder you > pointed out. Maybe development release are made using exclusively BIOS ? Oh, sorry I wasn't explicit. In -CURRENT the installer images are dual-mode BIOS & UEFI -- they are MBR partitioned with a boot block for BIOS and also have an EFI System Partition for UEFI boot. When the UEFI support was merged back to stable/10 we kept the traditional BIOS-only images as well, in case there were unanticipated problems. The stable/10 -UEFI images are actually dual-mode as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.