From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Nov 6 08:09:35 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACFFA26BF9 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 08:09:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [78.47.246.247]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 147CE197A; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 08:09:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (root@eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id tA689Otu075713 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 6 Nov 2015 09:09:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: rodrigc@FreeBSD.org Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id tA689Dd2089655; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 15:09:14 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: tap(4) and host-only networking between host and guest To: Craig Rodrigues , Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> References: <20151104075454.GA99850@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <5639FF12.1020109@freebsd.org> <20151104131230.GA1117@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20151104184503.GC1117@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <563B8C9A.7070104@grosbein.net> <563BF60B.5090201@quip.cz> Cc: FreeBSD Net , Victor Sudakov From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <563C6029.5010109@grosbein.net> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 15:09:13 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on hz.grosbein.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 08:09:35 -0000 On 06.11.2015 07:59, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> wrote: > >> Eugene Grosbein wrote on 11/05/2015 18:06: >> >>> Yes, it is. And there is a solution: >>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165174 >>> >> >> I don't understand why such useful patches are left uncommited and without >> any comments in PR for years. >> >> > This is not official project policy, but in future, I recommend that for > submitting patches to the > project, people try to use the steps at: https://wiki.freebsd.org/CodeReview > to submit the patch to Phabricator. > > As a FreeBSD developer, I personally find that Phabricator is easier to > work with patches thatn Bugzilla. > > Other FreeBSD developers may disagree with me, but more FreeBSD developers > are starting to use Phabricator. I've just read https://wiki.freebsd.org/CodeReview and registered at Phabricator. It seems more developer-centric (it needs commit-messages etc.) and over-complicated for non-developer reporting small bug and supplying small fix.