Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 18:25:57 +0200 From: alex@big.endian.de (Alexander Langer) To: John Baldwin <jhb@pike.osd.bsdi.com> Cc: Trenton Schulz <twschulz@gloria.cord.edu>, libh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Libh Question Message-ID: <20000915182557.I23564@cichlids.cichlids.com> In-Reply-To: <200009110349.UAA32009@pike.osd.bsdi.com>; from jhb@pike.osd.bsdi.com on Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 08:49:39PM -0700 References: <Pine.BSI.4.10.10009102229140.23513-100000@gloria.cord.edu> <200009110349.UAA32009@pike.osd.bsdi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake John Baldwin (jhb@pike.osd.bsdi.com): > Builiding dynamic is fine. The static version will only be used during > installation (if then, we may switch to using shared libs during install), > and installation will most likely not be using X, but TVision. Building the libhtcl* libs static finds many errors that you won't find w/ the dynamic linking. Don't ask me, why. Please, if you can do it statically, DO IT. the static stuff is also MUCH faster (about 10 times) than the dynamic stuff. Alex -- cat: /home/alex/.sig: No such file or directory To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000915182557.I23564>