From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Fri Dec 4 12:47:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4240EA40B3E; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 12:47:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18DB91443; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 12:47:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: from [192.168.1.22] (253.Red-83-32-1.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.32.1.253]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A1443BC7; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 06:47:27 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: svn commit: r402813 - head/misc/astrolog To: Andrey Chernov , marino@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org References: <201512020629.tB26TbDb060296@repo.freebsd.org> <565E9DFA.6050502@marino.st> <565EAB52.6010301@freebsd.org> <565EAD1E.8080805@marino.st> <565EB1AC.4000508@freebsd.org> <565EB3B7.8030208@marino.st> <565EB894.4090402@freebsd.org> <565EBB1F.20208@marino.st> <565EBFA4.2010101@freebsd.org> <565EC203.2020204@marino.st> <565EC64D.2060701@freebsd.org> <565EC804.1070406@marino.st> <566187D3.8080009@freebsd.org> Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org From: John Marino Message-ID: <56618B5C.5070008@marino.st> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 13:47:24 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <566187D3.8080009@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 12:47:31 -0000 On 12/4/2015 1:32 PM, Andrey Chernov wrote: > Dear John, > "we" all know that using word "we" in such context ("We know what you > really meant") is "whole collective force vs. just single person" > undisguised manipulation. ("it doesn't take a mind reader") Admitting > ability of mind reading even without using specific mind read skills > confirms your haughtily attitude even more. Should we take a poll? What percentage of the people would have to agree with my interpretation for you to concur it's how the majority would interpret it? > ("and if the unpleasantness") All unpleasant in this conversation is not > your position about the ports, it can rightfully exist among other > positions, with agreement or disagreement from others, it is normal, but > only your superego-style to handle communications (f.e. by accusing me > of dirty tricks of changing my words meaning), this is not productive > and not acceptable. > I may disagree with your position, but I admit it is consistent and have > its place. But I can't accept anybody attempting to speak with me in > such tone with insulting assumptions on any subject and need a little > bit of respect to feel pleasant. Yet you feel it's okay to insinuate that I internal (mental) issues in the course of the discussion. Oh, ok. Hypocritical much? > So I prefer to stay away of speaking with you for a while not on this > subject only, but on all other subjects too until this situation will be > changed, I hope. > Sincerely yours, > It was over. Don't forgot who started how it started.