From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 26 12:19:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0991106566B for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 12:19:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wjw@digiware.nl) Received: from mail.digiware.nl (mail.ip6.digiware.nl [IPv6:2001:4cb8:1:106::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 503C08FC1B for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 12:19:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rack1.digiware.nl (localhost.digiware.nl [127.0.0.1]) by mail.digiware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6790153434; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 14:19:22 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at digiware.nl Received: from mail.digiware.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by rack1.digiware.nl (rack1.digiware.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YAV90vzD91WQ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 14:19:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:2001:4cb8:3:1:c02b:ce62:71ff:9cbc] (unknown [IPv6:2001:4cb8:3:1:c02b:ce62:71ff:9cbc]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digiware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB450153433; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 14:19:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E0723D2.8050706@digiware.nl> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 14:19:30 +0200 From: Willem Jan Withagen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Hartland References: <4E0674ED.5090502@digiware.nl> <4BF3C5A181754319A7A83BE40F321E29@multiplay.co.uk> <4E0719EF.4060403@digiware.nl> <6049DAF547274E10A11C66936374E878@multiplay.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <6049DAF547274E10A11C66936374E878@multiplay.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: arcmsr panic runnig 8.2 of 2011 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 12:19:24 -0000 On 26-6-2011 13:50, Steven Hartland wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Willem Jan Withagen" > >> Well the main key to the problem is that on 2011/06/06 the new version >> from Areca got imported. So if you have all your boxes with kernels >> predating 06-06, you're not running the new code. >> >> It the above is true and if you have a spare/development box, it would >> be interesting to see if a very recent 8.2-STABLE would work. >> >> But thanx for giving me a reference point. > > Ahh when you said 8.2 that infers release not stable which is 8-stable > in my mind. > > So to clarify all our machines are running 8.2-release with a few minor > imports from stable to fix local issues such as the updated ixgbe driver. > > I don't have a box I can use to test stable I'm afraid sorry. Hi Steven, My sense is more or less the other way around. 8.2 would feel like 8.2-stable, and only release when specifcally marked so. But then that's probably where one is coming from. I always run non-RELEASE version. Too bad, I only have one controller and it is in active use.... I'd otherwise build a clean system. But then use this as a point of attention, once you want to proceed from release into stable.... --WjW