Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:02:44 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: ed@80386.nl, rdivacky@freebsd.org Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, christoph.mallon@gmx.de Subject: Re: hosted, or not (Re: Renaming all symbols in libmp(3)) Message-ID: <49a8fdb4.47pe/BeTfmPBIr7P%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <20090227082417.GA55567@freebsd.org> References: <20090226180756.GX19161@hoeg.nl> <20090226204243.GA96251@zim.MIT.EDU> <49A70092.6030601@gmx.de> <49a79a4e.jj/fvw29lwxNJgz%2B%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20090227082417.GA55567@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Roman Divacky <freebsd.org!rdivacky@agora.rdrop.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:46:22PM -0800, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > > >> By default, LLVM has a built-in prototype of pow(), similar to > > > >> GCC. Unlike GCC, LLVM raises a compiler error by default ... > > > > > ... it's invalid code to have a function named pow() > > > in a hosted environment which is not /The/ pow(). > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > I don't suppose LLVM supports a commmand-line switch to use > > embedded mode instead of hosted? > > of course it does.... -ffreestanding So perhaps one solution would be to compile libmp with -ffreestanding?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49a8fdb4.47pe/BeTfmPBIr7P%perryh>