From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Aug 7 10:09:03 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA19652 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 10:09:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA19643 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 10:09:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from etinc.com (etinc.com [204.141.244.98]) by who.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with SMTP id KAA01216 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 10:09:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dialup-usr11.etinc.com (dialup-usr11.etinc.com [204.141.95.132]) by etinc.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA09633 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 13:11:27 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 Aug 1996 13:11:27 -0400 Message-Id: <199608071711.NAA09633@etinc.com> X-Sender: dennis@etinc.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 2.0.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: hackers@freebsd.org From: dennis@etinc.com (Dennis) Subject: IPX/NS addressing question Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk It seems that if you add xns addresss on two interfaces, lots of stuff stops working, particularly that the box ARPs with the wrong address. I know that there was some discussion about there only being 1 hardware address per system....but this seems to suggest that its broken altogether. Is there a workaround, as -current is not an option. Dennis ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Emerging Technologies, Inc. http://www.etinc.com Synchronous Communications Cards and Routers For Discriminating Tastes. 56k to T1 and beyond. Frame Relay, PPP, HDLC, and X.25 for BSD/OS, FreeBSD and LINUX