From owner-freebsd-net Fri Aug 31 13: 3:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from wall.polstra.com (rtrwan160.accessone.com [206.213.115.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593B937B408 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 13:03:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13]) by wall.polstra.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f7VK3kg03443; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 13:03:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@wall.polstra.com) Received: (from jdp@localhost) by vashon.polstra.com (8.11.5/8.11.0) id f7VK3k004259; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 13:03:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 13:03:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200108312003.f7VK3k004259@vashon.polstra.com> To: net@freebsd.org From: John Polstra Cc: bright@mu.org Subject: Re: Tuning UDP for NFS In-Reply-To: <20010831125120.O81307@elvis.mu.org> References: <20010831130902.A15501@nomad.lets.net> <20010831125120.O81307@elvis.mu.org> Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In article <20010831125120.O81307@elvis.mu.org>, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > Using UDP is usually a bad idea, I would use tcp, I find that these > flags make for a decent mount point that's quite fast: > rw,tcp,intr,nfsv3,-w=32768,-r=32768 FreeBSD's "src/etc/amd.map" file still has "vers=2,proto=udp". Do you think we should change it? John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message