From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 29 21:39:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DBE816B095 for ; Mon, 29 May 2006 21:39:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@sippysoft.com) Received: from sippysoft.com (gk.360sip.com [72.236.70.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F3743DE9 for ; Mon, 29 May 2006 21:39:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sobomax@sippysoft.com) Received: from [192.168.1.80] ([204.244.149.125]) (authenticated bits=0) by sippysoft.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4TLcwhV014889 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 29 May 2006 14:38:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sobomax@sippysoft.com) Message-ID: <447B69EA.20502@sippysoft.com> Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 14:38:50 -0700 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Sippy Software User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Long References: <447AB34C.4030509@sippysoft.com> <447B5A43.4000707@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <447B5A43.4000707@samsco.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 29 May 2006 22:19:22 +0000 Cc: "current@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Importing iSCSI target from NetBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 21:40:06 -0000 Scott, It seems that you aren't aware that Intel/NetBSD implementation is completely userland one and it uses any block device/file as backing store (no interaction with CAM). Therefore, it won't interfere with whatever work you and others do in the CAM area. -Maxim Scott Long wrote: > Maxim Sobolev wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I wonder if anybody has any objections to importing iSCSI target >> daemon from NetBSD (Intel) into the base. >> >> -Maxim > > Yes. I'm nearing completion of locking CAM, and adding new subsystems > is not going > to help that effort at the moment. I'd also like you to talk with Matt > Jacob and Nate Lawson > about it since they have quite a bit of current experience with the SCSI > target side of things. > So in other words, a drive-by commit is not welcome and will be drive-by > uncommitted unless > you work with the people who can provide help and guidance. > > Scott > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >