From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 6 06:08:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA24A16A4DF for ; Sun, 6 Aug 2006 06:08:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ssedov@mbsd.msk.ru) Received: from com1.ht-systems.ru (com1.ht-systems.ru [83.97.104.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B1843D53 for ; Sun, 6 Aug 2006 06:08:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ssedov@mbsd.msk.ru) Received: from [217.118.83.1] (helo=fonon.realnet) by com1.ht-systems.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1G9bo8-0006Os-5O for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 06 Aug 2006 10:08:18 +0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fonon.realnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9401D11B6B for ; Sun, 6 Aug 2006 10:07:48 +0400 (MSD) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 10:07:43 +0400 From: Stanislav Sedov To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060806100743.6e429708@localhost> In-Reply-To: <44D51EAE.10387.D6FEBEF@dan.langille.org> References: <44D51EAE.10387.D6FEBEF@dan.langille.org> Organization: MBSD labs, Inc. X-Operating-System: FreeBSD X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_L2WHxk3hRYo34+fKpy.812U; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Spam-Flag: SKIP X-Spam-Yversion: Spamooborona 1.6.0 Subject: Re: chmod to other than root:wheel X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2006 06:08:19 -0000 --Sig_L2WHxk3hRYo34+fKpy.812U Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 22:41:50 -0400 "Dan Langille" mentioned: > A user has suggested installing bconsole (part of the sysutils/bacula- > client port) as "chgrp bacula" and "chmod g+w", as opposed to the=20 > default root:wheel. I think that makes sense. Do we have a policy=20 > on this type of thing? >=20 Why you need to make executable group-writable? For what it's intended for? Regarding datafiles - we have a lot of ports that change owner/group/perms of installed files. You could redefine SHAREMODE/SHAREOWN/SHAREGRP variables to install with right permissions. --=20 Stanislav Sedov MBSD labs, Inc. =F2=CF=D3=D3=C9=D1, =ED=CF=D3=CB=D7=C1 http://mbsd.msk.ru -------------------------------------------------------------------- If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts. -- A. Einstein -------------------------------------------------------------------- PGP fingerprint: F21E D6CC 5626 9609 6CE2 A385 2BF5 5993 EB26 9581 --Sig_L2WHxk3hRYo34+fKpy.812U Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE1Yc0K/VZk+smlYERAnEcAKCBm5UYuXNzYzb07S4CTAtR4Q8d3gCfd73B zYLmSqzx6u/B5vP91J5JY4c= =simB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_L2WHxk3hRYo34+fKpy.812U--