From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan  5 10:59:17 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5475C1065672;
	Thu,  5 Jan 2012 10:59:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9578FC14;
	Thu,  5 Jan 2012 10:59:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2])
	by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1054F62A0;
	Thu,  5 Jan 2012 10:39:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id E408B8CB8; Thu,  5 Jan 2012 11:39:40 +0100 (CET)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
References: <CAJ-Vmo=qNu9KpF6kSofychNcjwexFKvAT8bnwd3gVr-VPymN5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:39:40 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=qNu9KpF6kSofychNcjwexFKvAT8bnwd3gVr-VPymN5w@mail.gmail.com>
	(Adrian Chadd's message of "Wed, 4 Jan 2012 23:57:44 -0800")
Message-ID: <86ty4a8mc3.fsf@ds4.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>,
	freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Is it possible to make subr_acl_nfs4 and subr_acl_posix1e
	disabled?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:59:17 -0000

Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> writes:
> Since I'm not using NFS or UFS_ACL, I wondered if that code required.
> It turns out I can just build a kernel with those two disabled.
>
> Would it be possible to remove them from "standard" and make them
> optional? Or is there a reason to keep it in base?

I would be very annoyed if it were no longer possible to netboot
GENERIC...

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no