From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 31 18:00:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F394B3BE for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 18:00:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F368FC0A for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 18:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9VI019K049625 for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 18:00:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q9VI01qV049624; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 18:00:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 18:00:01 GMT Message-Id: <201210311800.q9VI01qV049624@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Chris Rees Subject: Re: conf/99721: [patch] /etc/rc.initdiskless problem copy dotfile in subdirectories to the MFS filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Chris Rees List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 18:00:02 -0000 The following reply was made to PR conf/99721; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Chris Rees To: bug-followup@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: conf/99721: [patch] /etc/rc.initdiskless problem copy dotfile in subdirectories to the MFS filesystem Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:57:33 +0000 On 31 October 2012 12:25, Florian Zavatzki wrote: > On 10/31/2012 11:32 AM, crees@FreeBSD.org wrote: >> Thank you-- my suggested fix is to use pax which doesn't execute two >> programs where one would do. >> http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/99721.diff Thoughts? > > Looks good. But I'm not using any diskless clients at the moment, so I > can't test it. If you tested the tar version and it worked, this version is identical, as I have tested that :) Chris