From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 21:52:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8834F1065670 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 21:52:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D5E18FC13 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 21:52:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so3900954wib.13 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:52:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=CEgWfmvLnmTW0NJKiDgqB3vilGqMrXytzTwgbhC0eQQ=; b=EvKMO/p5wiUAwvlNsEfUUAXqRkI6WwNVfdLABnpnxP0uM27s9E+UnW0coJtBU5dxie c//bVBsXDCUoyqEA53EqqJFjQ8atGxyTIAbvmEFV4z1o2wbYMxcMn6B2Zcgeszt0vhxw GRI6qz370sXJLVjfwvmZ+yhCcNjNELNW48pU/WJREhAcEkfjpbBSfLoPhw97VwqHqJIC u0y4BzlnIBy9Y/XKzTlhasl+RHtL3koG07xOM/cGjxtEcJTKqw1tLviwzKVEC47WXqCj xiyOS1anL+qrRDWfCkoZxFtWKjsjl1lUOdhJyjNDdoL/qNO6qT6Ts0PmkQyxFTbrJ5Dg cc0Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.78.6 with SMTP id x6mr21584806wiw.18.1331070763123; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:52:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.198.81 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 13:52:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201203062251.39786.zec@fer.hr> References: <201203062245.41155.zec@fer.hr> <201203062251.39786.zec@fer.hr> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 13:52:43 -0800 Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Marko Zec Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 23:09:55 +0000 Cc: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VIMAGE + kldload wlan + kldload wtap panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:52:44 -0000 On 6 March 2012 13:51, Marko Zec wrote: > On Tuesday 06 March 2012 22:49:56 Adrian Chadd wrote: >> Wait a sec. Is it possible that the macro is a no-op when we're >> building modules w/ VNET? > > Yes that's it, the VNET stuff resolves (mostly) to whitespace when options > VIMAGE is not on! So the question is - how the heck are the modules supposed to pull in the VNET config? is there a missing opt_.h somewhere? Adrian