From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 25 13:35:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BBE916A41F for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 13:35:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stanley.jobson@gmx.ch) Received: from sigma.informatik.hu-berlin.de (sigma.informatik.hu-berlin.de [141.20.20.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A45A943D48 for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 13:35:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stanley.jobson@gmx.ch) Received: from tyrael.linnet (p54BCDDA2.dip.t-dialin.net [84.188.221.162]) (authenticated bits=0) by sigma.informatik.hu-berlin.de (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.4/INF-2.0-MA-SOLARIS-2.10) with ESMTP id j8PDYYjS018053; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 15:34:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 15:33:04 +0200 From: stanley jobson To: "Daniel O'Connor" Message-Id: <20050925153304.4edf87cb.stanley.jobson@gmx.ch> In-Reply-To: <200509251923.53947.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <20050924180909.78a29487.stanley.jobson@gmx.ch> <20050924163501.GA53285@neptune.atopia.net> <20050925095140.5bbb3162.stanley.jobson@gmx.ch> <200509251923.53947.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Status: No (sigma) X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=no version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on rabe Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lpt0 always busy X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 13:35:01 -0000 > > so it seems that fbsd expects some kind of status reply from the > > printer - correct? > > > > if so: how could i by-pass this? (cause my ugly gdi printer is > > probably not able to answer correctly) i just wonna have access to > > my parallel port ... > > It expects that your printer will toggle the BUSY line as it should.. > I don't believe you'd be able to print on any OS if this was broken. i have a separate box running win98. from this box i am able to use the printer with the orig vendor driver without any problem ... > > Are you sure nothing else is using the port? (lpd, cups, etc) > i think so: lpd is not running and lsof | grep lpt doesnt show anything either : ( so i guess there could be a prob with the ready/status checking procedure any other ideas? any idea how to by pass this check so other programs (like qemu) could simple use the port? maybe it s necessary to hack the lpt driver - but because i am not a kernel hacker (maybe a good c hacker :)) - some help with this would be really nice ... thx regards, stan