From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 27 16:01:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C8D16A41F for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 16:01:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stanley.jobson@gmx.ch) Received: from sigma.informatik.hu-berlin.de (sigma.informatik.hu-berlin.de [141.20.20.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D686443D7D for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 16:01:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stanley.jobson@gmx.ch) Received: from tyrael.linnet (p54BCC19B.dip.t-dialin.net [84.188.193.155]) (authenticated bits=0) by sigma.informatik.hu-berlin.de (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.4/INF-2.0-MA-SOLARIS-2.10) with ESMTP id j8RG1COx010089; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 18:01:35 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 17:59:43 +0200 From: stanley jobson To: "Daniel O'Connor" Message-Id: <20050927175943.3c1e03ae.stanley.jobson@gmx.ch> In-Reply-To: <200509272200.08853.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <20050924180909.78a29487.stanley.jobson@gmx.ch> <200509260849.50510.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20050927102636.22f39e53.stanley.jobson@gmx.ch> <200509272200.08853.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Status: No (sigma) X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=no version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on rabe Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lpt0 always busy X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 16:01:44 -0000 > > > > You could try printing to /dev/lpt0.ctl since that will ignore > > > BUSY for the open. > > > > one can print using lpt0.ctl? - thx 4 the hint - i'll check this ... > > Well, I'm pretty sure you can. > AFAIK the only difference is that lpt0.ctl ignores BUSY on open so > lptcontrol can use it. > unfort. qemu is not able to open lpt0.ctl too (no perm prob) but i will do some more testing in this direction ... thx regards, stan