From owner-freebsd-doc  Sun Apr  2 18:27:37 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.ptd.net (mail2.ha-net.ptd.net [207.44.96.66])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D77937BC6B
	for <freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>; Sun,  2 Apr 2000 18:27:25 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from tms2@mail.ptd.net)
Received: (qmail 2345 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2000 01:27:16 -0000
Received: from du13.cli.ptd.net (HELO mail.ptd.net) (204.186.33.13)
  by mail.ptd.net with SMTP; 3 Apr 2000 01:27:16 -0000
Message-ID: <38E7F33D.C316ABF7@mail.ptd.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2000 21:26:21 -0400
From: "Thomas M. Sommers" <tms2@mail.ptd.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Handbook: FreeBSD Internals- Request for Review
References: <Pine.SOL.3.93.1000402112529.9056A-100000@tick.ece.utexas.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

In this sentence (in 24.1.1.1) :

Today, the fallibility of that argument is 
obvious -- as are the parallels to algorithmic design and 
code generalization.

I think 'fallibility' should be 'fallacy'.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message