From owner-freebsd-security  Wed Dec  6  6:52:46 2000
From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec  6 06:52:44 2000
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from saturn.innonet.at (saturn.innonet.at [194.152.190.3])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9380337B400
	for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed,  6 Dec 2000 06:52:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from saturn.innonet.at (IDENT:pm@saturn.innonet.at [194.152.190.3])
	by saturn.innonet.at (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id eB6Eovs21485;
	Wed, 6 Dec 2000 15:50:57 +0100
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 15:50:56 +0100 (MET)
From: Manfred Petz <pm@aber.warum.net>
X-Sender: pm@saturn.innonet.at
To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com>
Cc: Alexander Gavrilov <agv@haba.uven.ru>,
	freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: TIS Firewall Tookit
In-Reply-To: <20001206081015.B61027@spawn.nectar.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.04.10012061544350.20839-100000@saturn.innonet.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:

| Neither SOCKS nor delegate are firewall software.  The latter, in
| particular, is probably one of the least secure pieces of proxy software
| ever written.

Accepted. Do you know a (free) alternative to FWTK which is comparable in
terms of ease of use, straightforward source and which implements similar
functionality (e.g. the permit/deny rules in netperm-table)?

pm



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message