From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 8 02:00:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: doc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 893AD16A421 for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 02:00:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pittgoth.com (ns1.pittgoth.com [216.38.206.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E2C543D4C for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 02:00:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (net-ix.gw.ai.net [205.134.160.6] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j9824vEx019294 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 7 Oct 2005 22:04:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 21:59:26 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Message-Id: <20051007215926.702fc16e.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20051006170801.GB20088@soaustin.net> References: <20051006074516.3F3251551@fury.csh.rit.edu> <20051006080941.GD2627@soaustin.net> <20051006135047.B0AB91551@fury.csh.rit.edu> <20051006170801.GB20088@soaustin.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linimon@lonesome.com, doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FAQ Updates X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 02:00:30 -0000 On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 12:08:01 -0500 linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) wrote: > On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 09:50:47AM -0400, Jordan Sissel wrote: > > The handbook would be an excellent place for such information! Great way > > to consolidate most of the "how to use FreeBSD" information even better > > into one location. Etc, etc. Preaching to the choir, eh? > > Yeah, really this has been discussed several times in the past and there > are several people who want things to head in this direction, but each > of them has other higher-priority items. (read: I personally am way to > overcommitted to do this ...) > Does this mean my patch for the FAQ -> Handbook work is back in? :) -- Tom Rhodes