From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Dec 30 19:50:58 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA26606 for chat-outgoing; Tue, 30 Dec 1997 19:50:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from phoenix.its.rpi.edu (dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu [128.113.161.45]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA26590 for ; Tue, 30 Dec 1997 19:50:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu) Received: from localhost (dec@localhost) by phoenix.its.rpi.edu (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id WAA00713; Tue, 30 Dec 1997 22:50:20 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 22:50:20 -0500 (EST) From: "David E. Cross" To: Satoshi Asami cc: leec@adam.adonai.net, jkh@time.cdrom.com, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fbsd & commerce (Re: Informix on FreeBSD (maybe)) In-Reply-To: <199712310314.TAA26782@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org [i have removed hackers from the CC list] On Tue, 30 Dec 1997, Satoshi Asami wrote: > * How would the FreeBSD Project feel if they found some rogue > * company in Austin was charging for FreeBSD, installing, training, > * and support? > > I wish there were more companies doing that! > > Satoshi That is even perfectly legal under the GNU license... For a BSD licence, more power to them.