Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:33:27 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@sigpipe.cz> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Unifying WWW: pkg-descr lines for cpan ports Message-ID: <1126614807.54365.28.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> In-Reply-To: <20050913122601.GG563@isis.sigpipe.cz> References: <200509102222.j8AMMubj032724@bright.research.att.com> <4326A53C.5020808@FreeBSD.org> <1126609121.54365.17.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <4326B439.4090308@FreeBSD.org> <1126610216.54365.20.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <4326B5CF.1070606@FreeBSD.org> <1126610573.54365.23.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20050913122601.GG563@isis.sigpipe.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-QuZaEape94YErFkjeZYi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Roman Neuhauser p=ED=B9e v =FAt 13. 09. 2005 v 14:26 +0200:
> # pav@FreeBSD.org / 2005-09-13 13:22:53 +0200:
> > Sergey Matveychuk p=ED=B9e v =FAt 13. 09. 2005 v 15:19 +0400:
> > > Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > > >=20
> > > > Sounds very specific for a general article on pkg-descr.
> > > >=20
> > > > Wouldn't it be better in Section 6.4 instead?
> > > >=20
> > >=20
> > > May be. If I'm sure, I'd give you a patch :)
> >=20
> > Yes I think it would be better there :) Please mail me an exact wording
> > of a paragraph you want there, I'll handle the SGML and committing for
> > you.
>=20
> I beg to disagree. I wouldn't be looking for it there. A 3.2.1.1
> would be better.
I don't want to clutter Quick Porting section with such specialized
info. It's supposed to give you a really quick start to your first port.
We can debate if the structuring of PH into Quick Porting and Slow
Porting, duplicating much of the data of first in the second, is a good
design.
We could do a detailed subchapter in Chapter 8 about pkg-descr, if
desired.
> Though I don't see a single fourth level chapter in the whole PH.
> Is that too deep?
It could be a "Note:".
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
If God is perfect, why did He create discontinuous functions?
--=-QuZaEape94YErFkjeZYi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBDJscXntdYP8FOsoIRAhjEAJ0ZlJdMHZaYiKhwT8VhPOjjXR0KOACeI+vt
reqTGSOKGklxLLTa5pWAwsI=
=Uv+X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-QuZaEape94YErFkjeZYi--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1126614807.54365.28.camel>