From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Jan 9 03:04:57 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id DAA23219 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 03:04:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from hda.hda.com (ip24-max1-fitch.ziplink.net [199.232.245.24]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id DAA23212 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 03:04:54 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dufault@localhost) by hda.hda.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id FAA00937; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 05:59:40 -0500 From: Peter Dufault Message-Id: <199701091059.FAA00937@hda.hda.com> Subject: Re: Niklas Hallqvist: archivers/hpack.non-usa.only In-Reply-To: <199701090057.QAA05045@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from Satoshi Asami at "Jan 8, 97 04:57:04 pm" To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 05:59:39 -0500 (EST) Cc: obrien@cs.ucdavis.edu, imp@village.org, m230761@ingenieria.ingsala.unal.edu.co, ache@nagual.ru, ports@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL25 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > * So, my proprosal is for each of us to add __44bsd__ to our list of > * predefined macros. > > I have no problem with that. In fact, if we are going to do this we > should put this (gcc mods, not necessarily the port mods) in the 2.2 > branch, so that the whole ports tree doesn't break down to 2.2 users > right after the release. If you do this use the POSIX suggested feature test macro and add _BSD4_4 (table B-1 P1003.1b-1993 though they only go up to _BSD4_2) -- Peter Dufault (dufault@hda.com) Realtime Machine Control and Simulation HD Associates, Inc. Voice: 508 433 6936