From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 18 09:59:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99C97E78 for ; Mon, 18 May 2015 09:59:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82F351D1C for ; Mon, 18 May 2015 09:59:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t4I9xiS8018607 for ; Mon, 18 May 2015 09:59:44 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 199866] [MAINTAINER-UPDATE] dns/knot: update on 1.6.3 - LibreSSL and GOST Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 09:59:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: erwin@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 09:59:44 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199866 Erwin Lansing changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |erwin@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #4 from Erwin Lansing --- > Now Knot 2.0.0-beta isn't ready to replace knot 1.6 yet, but at one point it will. > Is it smart to add the PKGNAMESUFFIX=16 ..? I would suggest to do it the other way around for as long as the knot 1.x series is the recommended version, and have that be called knot (both in PKGNAME and in dns/knot) and thus have the new beta port as dns/knot2 and knot2 as name suffix. This can be moved around when 2.x becomes the default version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.