From owner-freebsd-security Tue Jul 10 14:48: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from d170h113.resnet.uconn.edu (d170h113.resnet.uconn.edu [137.99.170.113]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3FEBA37B405 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 14:47:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sirmoo@cowbert.2y.net) Received: (qmail 73142 invoked by uid 1001); 10 Jul 2001 21:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20010710215300.73141.qmail@d170h113.resnet.uconn.edu> References: <00ff01c10950$86f94000$3200000a@Intranet> In-Reply-To: <00ff01c10950$86f94000$3200000a@Intranet> From: "Peter C. Lai" To: "Ryan Masse" Cc: "FreeBSD-Security" Subject: Re: security advisories Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 21:53:00 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The samba advisory isn't really relevant to Fbsd in the first place because a default installation of the samba port for at least the past 12 months (in which we have gone through 3 minor fbsd version revisions and more than 3 minor samba version revisions) has the logging configuration set as log.%m Ryan Masse writes: > shouldn't some of these advisories been issued long before now? the samba > vunerability has been mainstream for 2+ weeks. > > http://us6.samba.org/samba/whatsnew/macroexploit.html > > Ryan > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message ----------- Peter C. Lai University of Connecticut Dept. of Residential Life | Programmer Dept. of Molecular and Cell Biology | Undergraduate Research Assistant/Honors Program http://cowbert.2y.net/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message