Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 05:00:19 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ports missing their packages. Message-ID: <20081029180019.GS1137@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20081029152236.GE6191@soaustin.net> References: <NBECLJEKGLBKHHFFANMBIEDJCMAA.fbsd1@a1poweruser.com> <257377.83845.qm@web56801.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <20081029152236.GE6191@soaustin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--q5r20fdKX+PFtYHw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2008-Oct-29 10:22:36 -0500, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> wrote: >We also have some sparc64 machines that are on loan to us, which I am >also in the process of configuration, but these are only UltraSPARC-II >machines. There seems to be some work going on right now to get us >running on US-III machines; if so, then it would be handy to get some of >them. In the meantime, sparc64 package builds take more than 2 weeks :-( Since sparc64 userland will run on sun4v (similar to using (eg) Pentium userland on a Pentium-4 CPU), the other option is to invest some resources in the sun4v port and build sparc64 packages on a sun4v cluster. --=20 Peter Jeremy Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour. --q5r20fdKX+PFtYHw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkkIpLMACgkQ/opHv/APuIeX8gCgn3beoDlT/7pkWDalptRHa9o3 6qcAoIkFP/lHxrEoyvnXKJkuO9hq1mFO =I5Z1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --q5r20fdKX+PFtYHw--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081029180019.GS1137>