From owner-freebsd-java Sat Aug 25 19: 9:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mgr2.xmission.com (mgr2.xmission.com [198.60.22.202]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6406F37B401 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 19:09:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from glewis@misty.eyesbeyond.com) Received: from [166.70.8.177] (helo=misty.eyesbeyond.com) by mgr2.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 15apMe-0003lQ-00; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 20:09:28 -0600 Received: (from glewis@localhost) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f7Q29On08085; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 11:39:24 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from glewis) Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 11:39:23 +0930 From: Greg Lewis To: Fuyuhiko Maruyama Cc: Greg Lewis , freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jdk1.3.1 awt exception, plugin, OpenJIT Message-ID: <20010826113923.A8065@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <20010825120422.A18841@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <20010825130721.A20869@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <55wv3sqxtc.wl@tripper.private> <20010826040557.A87652@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <55u1yvrij8.wl@tripper.private> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <55u1yvrij8.wl@tripper.private>; from fuyuhik8@is.titech.ac.jp on Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 05:28:27AM +0900 Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 05:28:27AM +0900, Fuyuhiko Maruyama wrote: > At Sun, 26 Aug 2001 04:05:57 +0930, > Greg Lewis wrote: > > > > > > Making symbolic link > > > /usr/local/jdk1.3.1/include/freebsd->/usr/local/jdk1.3.1/include/bsd > > > and > > > /usr/local/jdk1.3.1/include-old/freebsd->/usr/local/jdk1.3.1/include-old/bsd > > > may also fix the problem. > > > > Will it be easier if the build installs these include files in freebsd > > rather than bsd? I think maybe that is more correct, what are your > > thoughts? > I think installing those files in freebsd is not so good because our > J2SDK tree isn't only for FreeBSD but also for NetBSD and OpenBSD even > if currently it runs only on FreeBSD. From OpenJIT's point of view, > porting OpenJIT for NetBSD or OpenBSD may be easy as it already > supports Linux and FreeBSD by almost same codes, so placing those > include files in `bsd' is not so bad -- it simplifies our configure > scripts. The problem caused by the directory name can be solved by > modifing OpenJIT's configure scripts and it is quite easy and already > finished. Well, what I actually meant was what if we install the includes in freebsd on FreeBSD, netbsd on NetBSD, etc. I.e. we use the `actual' platform rather than the meta bsd platform name as the directory name. That strikes me as maybe being the scheme that some code assumes. -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Phone : (801) 765 1887 Information Technology Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message