From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 08:34:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39FCD16A4CE for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:34:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz (mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz [66.92.171.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16FE443D1D for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:34:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from culverk@sweetdreamsracing.biz) Received: by mailhub.sweetdreamsracing.biz (Postfix, from userid 80) id 753B82D2; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:39:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from 141.156.69.109 ([141.156.69.109]) by www.sweetdreamsracing.biz (Horde) with HTTP for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:39:43 -0500 Message-ID: <20040213113943.xfcw000sks8gs4kg@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:39:43 -0500 From: Kenneth Culver To: Bob Collins References: <24795.208.247.148.16.1076624911.squirrel@webmail.alienwebshop.com> <20040213163230.GA2538@yoda.anything-inc.com> In-Reply-To: <20040213163230.GA2538@yoda.anything-inc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.0-cvs cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mounting to freebsd ufs under WinXP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 16:34:42 -0000 Quoting Bob Collins : > On Fri, Feb 13, 2004, Chuck Swiger clacked the keyboard to produce: >> Peter Leftwich wrote: >> >Can someone recommend software that lets you mount TO freebsd (ufs) >> >partition FROM WITHIN Windows XP Pro SP1 (transparently)? >> >> I am not familiar with any such software, regrettably. You'd need a >> Windows developer experienced with their kernel and filesystem >> management code to write a "filesystem adaptor", or whatever the >> Windows phrase is... >> >> -- -Chuck >> > > Why not Samba? > Because most likely both filesystems are on the same machine. Ken