From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 15 23:48:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01FE5106564A for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:48:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout025.mac.com (asmtpout025.mac.com [17.148.16.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDFA78FC17 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:48:41 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp025.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0L8T0092LBGVXK60@asmtp025.mac.com>; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:48:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1004200000 definitions=main-1009150132 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.0.10011,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-09-15_18:2010-09-16, 2010-09-15, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <18672476.67591284594229837.JavaMail.defaultUser@defaultHost> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:48:31 -0700 Message-id: <3C14D56E-F631-4E84-8D38-1092FC8C861A@mac.com> References: <18672476.67591284594229837.JavaMail.defaultUser@defaultHost> To: freebsd-ports Ports X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Cc: ade@FreeBSD.org, autotools@freebsd.org Subject: Re: devel/autotools267 and UPDATING X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:48:42 -0000 Hi, all-- On Sep 15, 2010, at 4:43 PM, Barbara wrote: > About my previous mail, shouldn't the upgrade be handled by the entry in > MOVED? Is it a portupgrade problem? > Is the rebuild of ports like xmms or libX11 really necessary after a new > version of autoconf? It looks like maybe a repocopy is going on (or has gone wrong), since it is pointing to autoconf-2.62: # pwd /usr/ports/devel/autoconf267 # cat distinfo MD5 (autoconf-2.62.tar.bz2) = e1fb8fe0b22e651240afdfa2be537a3c SHA256 (autoconf-2.62.tar.bz2) = 42be7628e32fd3bebe07d684b11fb6e7e7920ef698fc4ccb3da6d77f91cefb96 SIZE (autoconf-2.62.tar.bz2) = 1165951 # head Makefile # New ports collection makefile for: autoconf262 # Date created: 7th December 2006 # Whom: ade@FreeBSD.org # # $FreeBSD: ports/devel/autoconf267/Makefile,v 1.75 2009/12/16 11:21:25 linimon Exp $ # PORTNAME= autoconf PORTVERSION= 2.62 CATEGORIES= devel Regards, -- -Chuck