From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Sep 26 08:59:08 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79B5FF00E for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 08:59:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglist@diamondbox.dk) Received: from mailrelay4-2.pub.mailoutpod1-cph3.one.com (mailrelay4-2.pub.mailoutpod1-cph3.one.com [46.30.212.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46f84C1C50z40GH for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 08:59:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglist@diamondbox.dk) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=diamondbox.dk; s=20140924; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:mime-version:date: message-id:from:references:to:subject:from; bh=ryyexoEg1MK0tPfvPcwSG881i5tK6+4i+RQz0rEM+dA=; b=jIn6pHweBNMFiN/zBpnipuh9Y8RVC3BXqccJ9WZHytMho/jC9/+Qlp3yqgdSmR64nQCn8A/Mfc7+U tIaHSYFRjWLO7+/bzokoOesqDm5H3clCKrZgnyN8mNgIciymyDZx2fhkjTWBj6K1EWoWRKAD770qvH TYw5AsGoDR5X9LCE= X-HalOne-Cookie: 4d2c3aa5ba8ffbc45eeb17d8813922c3cf5e726a X-HalOne-ID: a0f04466-e039-11e9-8286-d0431ea8bb10 Received: from diamond.diamondbox.dk (unknown [213.32.242.19]) by mailrelay4.pub.mailoutpod1-cph3.one.com (Halon) with ESMTPSA id a0f04466-e039-11e9-8286-d0431ea8bb10; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 08:42:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: NIC Compatibility for 11.2 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1BB9A8B635A5E84EBAC902C3A01120D4013AB3B69A@OP1-S-EX-C5.cgifederal.com> From: Nikolaj Thygesen Message-ID: <1da737f2-c990-087c-b61d-24b52a1495bb@diamondbox.dk> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 10:42:56 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1BB9A8B635A5E84EBAC902C3A01120D4013AB3B69A@OP1-S-EX-C5.cgifederal.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46f84C1C50z40GH X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=diamondbox.dk header.s=20140924 header.b=jIn6pHwe; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mailinglist@diamondbox.dk has no SPF policy when checking 46.30.212.3) smtp.mailfrom=mailinglist@diamondbox.dk X-Spamd-Result: default: False [6.66 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(0.00)[diamondbox.dk:s=20140924]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[3.212.30.46.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_XBL(5.00)[19.242.32.213.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.4]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[diamondbox.dk]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.87)[0.873,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; BAD_REP_POLICIES(0.10)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[diamondbox.dk:+]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[3.212.30.46.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.98)[0.984,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(-0.19)[ipnet: 46.30.208.0/21(-0.54), asn: 51468(-0.41), country: DK(-0.02)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:51468, ipnet:46.30.208.0/21, country:DK]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-Spam: Yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 08:59:08 -0000 ... this is what I have:     em0: mem 0xdf200000-0xdf21ffff at device 31.6 on pci0 ... and it has been working for years.     N :o) On 9/25/19 11:39 PM, Pressey, Marty G (CGI Federal) wrote: > I have a question regarding Ethernet NIC compatibility. According to your compatibility list at https://www.freebsd.org/releases/11.2R/hardware.html#ethernet, there are five (5) different Intel PRO/1000 MT NIC's listed. However, the 2 we are looking for are not on the list. Since the list is more than a year old, I'm wondering if there has been any additional testing to verify compatibility of these NIC's or if you can tell me if FreeBSD will support the use of these NIC's. I've included the two (2) we are using listed below. > > The reason for my question is that we are using a 3rd party software product that is using FreeBSD as its initial boot OS. Unfortunately, the vendor can't answer my question regarding compatibility. > > Intel PRO/1000 MT Network Connection > Intel PRO/1000 MT Network Connection E1G60 > > > Thanks, > Marty > > > Proprietary/confidential information belonging to CGI Federal Inc. or its affiliates may be contained in this message. If you are not a recipient indicated or intended in this message (or responsible for the delivery of this message to such person), or if you think for any reason that this message may have been addressed to you in error, you may not use or copy or deliver this message to anyone else. In such case, you should destroy this message and are asked to notify the sender by reply email. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"