From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 2 23:54:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCB2C106564A; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 23:54:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE628FC08; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 23:54:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbf13 with SMTP id f13so3395385vcb.13 for ; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 16:54:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=n+ObGYVDZL8uaXsXIAotJcmNpsqAAJEK21RE1l2Lnh8=; b=ulqIX/ZcOxU2sN9bDQrwj5i/FUeJBtviGNLUdo2UouN7uP8zm1lfQs3J4AuFLauwRN UnBbikyD41JjxC6kk68QQ6J+HOdxklK+xZmJotffS1Ct/OffZW81IRlhCEFSi0VnTYfe rd0gch+dLQtzfayJa8wJ8d1U1911gaI7NTSLo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.22.13 with SMTP id z13mr213539vde.441.1317598270234; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 16:31:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.107.137 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 16:31:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <71267f1b.41991640.4e88510a.b8fc3@mailplus.pl> References: <23921b5c.3a8c1058.4e8582fc.7004e@mailplus.pl> <262ab544.73de2a95.4e881fa7.83e38@mailplus.pl> <71267f1b.41991640.4e88510a.b8fc3@mailplus.pl> Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 23:31:09 +0000 Message-ID: From: "Paul B. Mahol" To: Jakub Lach Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Lyubomir@freebsd.org, freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Panic in AHDEMO mode (was: net-mgmt/aircrack-ng on FreeBSD 7+/call for testing) X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 23:54:29 -0000 On 10/2/11, Jakub Lach wrote: > Dnia 2 pazdziernika 2011 12:17 Adrian Chadd napisal/(a): > >> Well, "whether we care" still is drawing a line between users and >> developers here, right? :) >> >> It's not that I don't care, it's just that I don't have the time. If >> y'all want to sort it out, then that means "you care", and suddenly >> someone cares. :) >> >> So there's three of you there at least who are interested and one of >> you has given a patch. Let me know how it goes. :) >> >> >> >> Adrian > > I understand that you don't have time (I'm not either > idle) and in no way was that pointed to you, by > "not care" I was meaning that compared to number of > people complaining that aircrack-ng does not work, a > minuscule (one on ports list) tried aircrack-ng after > patching. (results similar to Lyubomir Grigorov). > > For now, it looks that if_ath is problematic either way, > and we are waiting for someone with (possibly) if_bwn > to ensure patching was beneficial at all/step in right > direction. > > I personally want to take ahdemo support of if_ath out > of equation presently, unless somebody feels capable > of investigating it on their own. > > (I'm using if_ath too, and airodump both in monitor/ahdemo > works, but with aircrack situation is same as before). I tested bwn injection in ahdemo long ago (and bwn have not changed at all from that time on CURRENT). There is one caveat with bwn driver: The interface (wlan0 from bwn0) must be set to UP with ifconfig. Setting it with aireplay/airodump may result in kernel panic but usually you will just get blank output from aireplay/airodump.