From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 4 14:10:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85FDB37B404 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:10:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA15043F93 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:10:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (athlon.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.3]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h54LAqwk019383; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:10:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h54LAqK2002096; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:10:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h54LAqbO002095; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:10:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:10:52 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Mark Murray Message-ID: <20030604211052.GA2050@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <200306042042.h54KgoHh007445@grimreaper.grondar.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200306042042.h54KgoHh007445@grimreaper.grondar.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A proposed drastic cleanup of the telnet build. X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 21:10:53 -0000 On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 09:42:50PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote: > > I propose to 'cvs rm' the 'base' telnet, and build base telnet by > not defining the appropriate macros. [snip] > The downside is that base telnet will depend on src/crypto/telnet, > so folks in dodgy countries which don't allow them to have crypto > source will not be able to do telnet development, and they will > not get a "fresh" telnet[d] after a make world. I think it's a good idea. Do you know how many (which?) dodgy countries there are on this particular rock we call the earth? I mean, WRT to this particular issue of course :-) -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net