From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 13 03:46:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9DB16A4B3 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 03:46:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.broadpark.no (mail.broadpark.no [217.13.4.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D83943F75 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 03:46:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (37.80-203-228.nextgentel.com [80.203.228.37]) by mail.broadpark.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id F100278A75; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 12:46:38 +0200 (MEST) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id B462B9BDDC; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 12:46:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dwp.des.no (dwp.des.no [10.0.0.4]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id DA3A59B531; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 12:46:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id C908FB823; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 12:46:34 +0200 (CEST) To: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) References: <20031011212201.GA67228@bishop.my.domain> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 12:46:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Christian Weisgerber's message of "Sun, 12 Oct 2003 21:57:39 +0000 (UTC)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on dsa.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: General Wireless Network Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 10:46:41 -0000 naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) writes: > Brad Knowles wrote: > > I would say that VOIP over 802.11b could very easily be marginal at=20 > > best. > Oh c'mon, standard telephony voice is 64kbit/s. No. ISDN voice uses up to 64 kbps, but analog POTS uses a lot less, and standard GSM works just fine with only 9600 bps. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no