From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Mar 27 22:51:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A8A5ADF4F7 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 22:51:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sbruno@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.ignoranthack.me (ignoranthack.me [199.102.79.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 535C71D6E for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 22:51:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sbruno@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.200.206] (unknown [50.136.155.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: sbruno@ignoranthack.me) by mail.ignoranthack.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B1AC1928E4; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 22:51:20 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Intel I219 V2 (if_em) Wake on LAN not working To: Guido Falsi , freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <56F284A0.4050900@madpilot.net> <56F489F3.7010208@FreeBSD.org> <56F7FD1E.8000806@freebsd.org> <56F803E2.1040507@madpilot.net> From: Sean Bruno Message-ID: <56F863E7.4090703@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 15:51:19 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56F803E2.1040507@madpilot.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 22:51:22 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 03/27/16 09:01, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 03/27/16 17:32, Sean Bruno wrote: >> >> >>>> From that, I see that eeprom_data is 0, so adapter->wol >>>> stays zero, so ifconfig >>> doesn't show any WOL capabilities. When I ignore the >>> eeprom_data by commenting out the "if" condition, WOL >>> capabilities appear in ifconfig. However, even when I enable >>> WOL with ifconfig, WOL still doesn't work after a "shutdown -p >>> now". WOL only works after I power off using the power button >>> before the kernel boots. >> >>> Eric >> >> >> >> I'm guessing that we have some kind of missing test case. Let's >> start a bugzilla report so I can bring it to Intel's attention. > > I'm going to file a bug later, I'll CC you. > >> >> I'll need a testcase as well so we can add this to regressions in >> the la b. > > What do you need in the testcase? The only data I'm sure about is > the chipset I have (PCI IDs) and the fact that I'm using head > r297146. Is any further information needed? > Nope, that should be *perfect*. Something like the output of pciconf - -lv for the card and the "how do I reproduce this" instructions. sean -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJW+GPjXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCQUFENDYzMkU3MTIxREU4RDIwOTk3REQx MjAxRUZDQTFFNzI3RTY0AAoJEBIB78oecn5k380H/RSxQPW/H3yxDCAMKgrNjBKV pJUtmFSrFQSZgP7C29WPP23y8v7lIklyZ6szg9uFMw24qLh/XriLyRzJq+smyJpq 9Y9d+0PA1LaRFdwEkpl936qAg/o2eXBNP8OhdR5fuEgQd07gonFIz3K73ZRD7QHo Fgp4uBQhdLaA/r6G15mQX4g/BVurXKxVtejodmje+U5pvRloe9Lh6MsicEAo9g1b +NSpaGmSCLIPhFlNNH/mTblD6ovhJg3vUGngbAXk1DMb/A4c118xy7m42wlmQiNc 5IN4vhqqaLq5JbSoutFyY4dTVaSEeqGSvLFW5uOPwoF9rH2opYcAop4PIP6YmxE= =25l0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----