From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Nov 13 14:23:58 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA11499 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Fri, 13 Nov 1998 14:23:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from jade.agen.tamu.edu (jade.agen.tamu.edu [165.91.105.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA11489 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 1998 14:23:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from b0l6604@agen.tamu.edu) Received: from my-computer ([165.91.68.181]) by jade.agen.tamu.edu (Netscape Messaging Server 3.52) with SMTP id AAA1A1E for ; Fri, 13 Nov 1998 16:22:03 -0600 Message-ID: <364CB2BC.20EC@agen.tamu.edu> Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 16:29:16 -0600 From: b0l6604@agen.tamu.edu (Bootsrapa Limanond) Reply-To: b0l6604@agen.tamu.edu X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: patch and re-build Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi: I would like to apply a patch to a source tree and rebuild a port. The patch is only for a file in the source tree. What I did was I applied the patch, using `patch' command and ran `make'. It looked like `make' removed my source tree, created a new one based on the .tar.gz file in the `distfiles' directory, and spent a couple of hours building the `old' port from scratch. Does `make' always unpack the `.tar.gz' file every time? Is there a way around this? Better yet, what is a correct way to build from a patched source tree? Thank you very much, Suttipan Limanond. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message