Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 29 May 2012 18:59:17 +0200
From:      Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com>
To:        David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>, James <james@hicag.org>,  FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Possible Clang regression - object files are always mode 0600
Message-ID:  <4FC50065.3030201@andric.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120529162701.GZ1509@albert.catwhisker.org>
References:  <CAD4099=POFm_bpBGjLXozFF9MX1SrAc-UCR8SwRnh7LVf=FdoQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120529162701.GZ1509@albert.catwhisker.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2012-05-29 18:27, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 01:39:19AM -0500, James wrote:
>> Hi all. I've come across a possible Clang regression that recently
>> crept into stable/9. I'd like to check to see whether it's a true bug
>> or if I jacked something up. It appears all object files are created
>> with mode 0600 rather than honoring umask.

Just so you know, this is indeed a regression that has crept into clang,
and even into the 3.1 release. :(

I'm working on fixing it in head, then I will merge the fix to stable/9
in a few days.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FC50065.3030201>