From owner-freebsd-questions Fri May 11 20:30: 5 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from thor.oit.pdx.edu (thor.oit.pdx.edu [131.252.120.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C2837B423 for ; Fri, 11 May 2001 20:30:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from singh@pdx.edu) Received: from gere.odin.pdx.edu (gere.odin.pdx.edu [131.252.120.42]) by thor.oit.pdx.edu (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f4C3U0007873 for ; Fri, 11 May 2001 20:30:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (singh@localhost) by gere.odin.pdx.edu (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f4C3Tx127553 for ; Fri, 11 May 2001 20:30:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: gere.odin.pdx.edu: singh owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 20:29:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Harkirat Singh X-X-Sender: To: Subject: Router ICMP Host-unreachable. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG My mistake C's address is 192.168.2.1!! On Fri, 11 May 2001, Harkirat Singh wrote: > > Hello, > > I have following test network of three laptops. > > > > > 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.2 192.168.2.2 (alias) 192.168.2.2 > A-----------------------B---------------------------C > > > It's a kind of Adhoc network, where B is acting as a router between A&C, B > (router) has two IP addresses, one for each subnet. A and C has B as a > default route. > > If C's interface goes down during ongoing TCP stream between A to C then B > does'nt generate HostUnreachable, rather it arp for C and keep on doing > arp. > > Can someone tell me what changes I should do so that when C's interface > goes down then B generates HostUnreachable to A. > > Thanks, > > -Harkirat > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message