From owner-freebsd-chat Fri May 25 15:55:42 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from Spaz.HuntsvilleAL.COM (spaz.huntsvilleal.com [63.147.8.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F4237B423 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 15:55:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@catonic.net) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by Spaz.HuntsvilleAL.COM (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4PMtNY83523; Fri, 25 May 2001 22:55:23 GMT Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 22:55:22 +0000 (GMT) From: Kris Kirby X-Sender: kris@spaz.huntsvilleal.com To: Terry Lambert Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPFilter not free software? In-Reply-To: <200105251842.LAA12049@usr05.primenet.com> Message-ID: X-Tech-Support-Email: bofh@catonic.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 25 May 2001, Terry Lambert wrote: > This is where most GPL stuff falls apart, since the GPL > effectively redefines "use" to be "utilize". The UCB > license doesn't have all the long-winded clauses which > do that: when the UCB license says "use", it meand "use". Correct me if I am wrong, but the UCB license was written by a lawyer. Is this true of the GPL? ----- Kris Kirby, KE4AHR | TGIFreeBSD... 'Nuff said. | ------------------------------------------------------- "Fate, it seems, is not without a sense of irony." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message