From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jul 18 9:37:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from kalaid.f2f.com.ua (kalaid.f2f.com.ua [62.149.0.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D036837B403 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 09:37:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from Mail-In.Net (borey.f2f.com.ua [62.149.0.24]) by kalaid.f2f.com.ua (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f6IGaGO05023; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 19:36:17 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from vega.vega.com ([212.35.189.182]) by Mail-In.Net (8.11.3/8.H.Z) with ESMTP id f6IGZfI25194; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 19:35:43 +0300 (EEST) Received: from FreeBSD.org (big_brother.vega.com [192.168.1.1]) by vega.vega.com (8.11.4/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f6IGYRD68985; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 19:34:27 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <3B55BAA6.79E9B9FD@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 19:34:47 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Vega International Capital X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en,uk,ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tlambert2@mindspring.com Cc: "Andrey A. Chernov" , Kris Kennaway , Garance A Drosihn , current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: libedit replacement for libreadline References: <20010716013127.A16058@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010716103351.A81876@walton.maths.tcd.ie> <20010716031932.A5930@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010717094027.A78232@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010717102713.A79329@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010718002343.A30891@nagual.pp.ru> <3B55B5E6.7D3659BD@mindspring.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=x-user-defined Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Terry Lambert wrote: > "Andrey A. Chernov" wrote: > > > > Okay. So it sounds like there's a "shim" to libedit which would be > > > > the API replacement for libreadline. Could we call that something > > > > cute like 'libreadlinele' ('le' for 'libedit') or 'libeditrl', but > > > > leave libreadline as a separate port? > > > > > > How about 'libedit'? :) I could live with that; it's just some > > > makefile changes. > > > > I vote this too. We don't need stripped down libreadline under > > 'libreadline' name pretend to be full version (f.e. for autoconf, etc.) > > The cryptography libraries have set a precedent here. I > could argue the same thing about the presence of a full DES > in libcrypt. I failed to understand what you are trying to say. Do you mean that we have to follow a bad practice set by that precedent at any costs, or I parsed your message incorrectly? -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message