Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 19:42:40 +1100 From: Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> To: Pavel Timofeev <timp87@gmail.com>, ports-list freebsd <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Cc: rozhuk.im@gmail.com Subject: Re: Why is security/py-pywinrm limited to Python 2.7 only? Message-ID: <e84f4d26-9267-eff2-3ad8-383d408a894a@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAAoTqfvgc1Wg5a2b0t%2BpqDnFPQf_43Ek%2Bsu0sjAFwHDP2B7NQQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAAoTqfvgc1Wg5a2b0t%2BpqDnFPQf_43Ek%2Bsu0sjAFwHDP2B7NQQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/04/2019 7:02 pm, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> Hello.
> I'm curious why security/py-pywinrm is limited to python 2.7 now.
>
> I tried it with python 3.6:
>
> --- security/py-pywinrm/Makefile.orig 2019-04-03 10:45:08.434229000 +0300
> +++ security/py-pywinrm/Makefile 2019-04-03 10:45:13.713012000 +0300
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
> ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}requests-credssp>=0.0.1:security/py-requests-credssp@${PY_FLAVOR}
>
> NO_ARCH= yes
> -USES= python:2.7
> +USES= python
> USE_PYTHON= autoplist distutils
>
> .include <bsd.port.mk>
>
>
> Port was successfully rebuilt (on FBSD12) with python3.6.
> Some basic operation works at least with ntlm auth,
>
> What is/was wrong with the port? I suppose it's worth to document it
> if there is a problem.
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/469695
No further detail in the commit log message (beyond pkg-fallout)
Maintainer is CC'd
If the port passes QA and run time tests (its own test suite ideally)
under Python 3.x, we can remove the limitation.
Just open up a Bugzilla issue with a patch after confirming QA
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e84f4d26-9267-eff2-3ad8-383d408a894a>