From owner-freebsd-enlightenment@freebsd.org Tue Dec 5 13:19:22 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-enlightenment@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B03E6993C for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 13:19:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE197A1E4 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 13:19:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CA092E69939; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 13:19:22 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: enlightenment@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9AC5E69938 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 13:19:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6E9F7A1E3 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 13:19:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id vB5DJMNG099396 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 13:19:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: enlightenment@FreeBSD.org Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 13:19:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tobik@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: enlightenment@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: E on FreeBSD: [Bug 224105] [UPDATE] port x11-wm/enlightenment to v0.22.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-enlightenment@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Enlightenment for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 13:19:23 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D224105 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Kortkamp --- (In reply to Nils Beyer from comment #2) > Regarding "PORTEPOCH" - I don't understand your objection. Why should > PORTEPOCH ever be lower than "0" (zero)? Isn't it sensible to reset PORTE= POCH=20 > to zero whenever PORTVERSION increases? No, you can reset PORTREVISION but never decrease or reset PORTEPOCH. It's increase-only. See https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-naming.html#= makefile-portepoch --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=