From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct 21 21:24:31 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E841C16A4CE; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:24:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3E6C943D31; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:24:31 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9LLOT9r036148;
	Thu, 21 Oct 2004 23:24:29 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:05:27 EDT."
             <200410211505.27635.jhb@FreeBSD.org> 
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 23:24:29 +0200
Message-ID: <36147.1098393869@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
cc: current@FreeBSD.org
cc: Tim Dettloff <dettloff@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Solution? Re: pxe-install on FreeBSD 5.3 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:24:32 -0000

In message <200410211505.27635.jhb@FreeBSD.org>, John Baldwin writes:

>> Doesn't the search terminate if [0] is NULL ?
>
>Perhaps there should be a small wrapper function to register a candidate root 
>with an associated priority and that wrapper function could then manage the 
>rootdevnames[] array and keep them sorted based on the priority?

No, the entire thing should be rototiled.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.