Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Jan 1998 10:32:16 -0500 (EST)
From:      John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu>
To:        daniel_sobral@voga.com.br
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Wide characters on tcp connections
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.980112101833.1419S-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu>
In-Reply-To: <8325658A.005211D4.00@papagaio.voga.com.br>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 12 Jan 1998 daniel_sobral@voga.com.br wrote:

> I'd like to know if there is any provision on TCP protocol for
> wide-character tcp streams.

I don't know the specific answer, but the definition of a wide
character itself is pretty vague.  For example ISO10646
(~Unicode) has specification for both 16 and 32 bit characters,
both of which would be considered "wide".  Unix wide character
implementations generally define "wide" as large enough to handle
any locale the vendor plans to support, and it may vary from
implementation to implementation.

For network communications using ISO10646/Unicode, byte encodings
such as UTF-7 or UTF-8 make things such as wide-character tcp
streams irrelevant, and they head off endian debates in the
process.

-john




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980112101833.1419S-100000>