From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu Mar 24 12:45:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A3CBADB8D4 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 12:45:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mokhi64@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C18A1C31 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 12:45:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mokhi64@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1818EADB8D2; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 12:45:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15473ADB8D1; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 12:45:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mokhi64@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x22d.google.com (mail-lb0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E2D91C2F; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 12:45:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mokhi64@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lb0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id qe11so29093945lbc.3; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 05:45:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=tTwTAyqkPSRxnkdlccfrdd2fn2tn0UGwi0cAr6b/Gj4=; b=qQr20Vr7gbQD6xVAFZF/nY5QIiZ2ufkhvxVfbkcBX7x6qlnPXFXoR3L747uTXHXq+e QZErKBzSCPSsbaMgwBg3TNla6hPxdeefRBagrIbXksn1HWYw2mYQCnt2g/CijUms8VxZ /tNm9kUZOX7JelgE2Gd05PD2rSKx0FLiXYmOibF8svjek68SwDccxiJPFeAqgs2fMJDl 0Aab2zM7zAIwhltpqplQzMLjoKPnJnPFIhPKKQzGYDhp8EB6x+HNzZ5nVTFEsMikoGRI lD0bojAm8114MdPi851mZyo0M1sxvDtCEvrkAEPM1vzjLZsesljvxXq+shGYF+h5DyMA JjMw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=tTwTAyqkPSRxnkdlccfrdd2fn2tn0UGwi0cAr6b/Gj4=; b=JKA242SGlNhY5bgwjqjNiAjmA3/MZExg4W0GRWGNHD+xx6q87DeerkJwycRzTJMD7F Sm4Wb1ByeLE/l827AVe6xlnLXCTIUk1n4FVeuU58XIg1apj+Bh2XCYe/ZXpfktYDPiQ6 +stBBZhTx6FcC9/s30+RJVPyJ2Y7HW8+s6V2mTjr3YDL5lcNvb3IerW3JcCUTL87yKun RSE6GeI5q5L0hl3KADXxbkr2l55Ng60DA7eUAZpOiRiACBIcLOBJhjq0U2LsjNiaPMZX 6Q5K4WtnCH3wavpszpnbC1h1yO3QeggxzcPm7k4sUK82cZ9FpLiI66o+IweSbcVTQPni xkcw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJL+D3vVsKXDJfZr45S6/MEuSEQdzCZeHO0WntIWsJDaeAbQGIjij/lYsIG7+YRM/xJGgzKOkvwvJVInaQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.172.68 with SMTP id ba4mr3274890lbc.86.1458823510885; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 05:45:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.139.68 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 05:45:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <7554521E-81AB-43DE-A7FC-A9F334F660B7@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:15:10 +0430 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD MachO File format, your comments on it. From: mokhi To: David Chisnall Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 12:45:13 -0000 On 3/24/16, mokhi wrote: > Then you think the better idea is porting FatELF to FreeBSD, rather > than working on MachO? > If yes, I am ready to put dedicated time on it :) [as I did for MachO] But before that, you think, is there any changes we can/should make on it? * I read something about FatELF when I was doing research for macho :)