From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue May 19 08:05:42 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA02998 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Tue, 19 May 1998 08:05:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA02987 for ; Tue, 19 May 1998 08:05:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA20354; Tue, 19 May 1998 11:05:35 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 11:05:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <199805191505.LAA20354@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Eivind Eklund Cc: Garrett Wollman , freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/6653 In-Reply-To: <19980519165526.43763@follo.net> References: <199805191310.GAA28279@freefall.freebsd.org> <199805191453.KAA20305@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <19980519165526.43763@follo.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org < said: >> I prefer /etc, since it is security-sensitive, and someone who is >> likewise concerned with security will take additional steps to secure >> /etc. > ... such as marking it read-only. Not too good. Or, more likely, marking it append-only. Works just fine, I've done it on several systems here. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message