From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 11 02:19:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06DF16A420 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 02:19:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (c00l3r.networx.ch [62.48.2.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC4A13C458 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 02:19:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 56574 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2008 01:43:18 -0000 Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([62.48.2.2]) (envelope-sender ) by c00l3r.networx.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 11 Jan 2008 01:43:18 -0000 Message-ID: <4786D23A.1080509@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 03:19:38 +0100 From: Andre Oppermann User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14 (Windows/20071210) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lawrence Stewart References: <20071219123305.Y95322@fledge.watson.org> <47693DBD.6050104@swin.edu.au> <476A45D6.6030305@freebsd.org> <47858D35.6060006@swin.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <47858D35.6060006@swin.edu.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: James Healy , arch@freebsd.org, Robert Watson , net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Coordinating TCP projects X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 02:19:34 -0000 Lawrence Stewart wrote: >> I've got a rewritten and much more efficient tcp_reass() function >> in my local tree. I'll import it into Perforce next week with all >> the other stuff. You may want to base your auto-sizing work on it. >> The only missing parts are some statistics gathering. >> > > Where abouts is this code? A cursory browse through the Perforce web > front-end reveals nothing. We're going to start work on the TCP > reassembly queue autotuning patch now and if you think we should base it > on your new tcp_reass() we need to have a look at it. The first cut is now at //depot/projects/tcp_reass/ however I made a mistake when creating the branch and now the code is in the same changeset as the branching itself. Doesn't make it easy to do a diff. Have to see how I can fix that. Anyway, have a look and I'm going to finish/fix the code tomorrow evening. -- Andre