Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 10:12:21 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: ada@not-enough.bandwidth.org (Ada T Lim) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: hackers-digest V3 #242 Message-ID: <199706181712.KAA20993@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199706180623.QAA03038@polya.blah.org> from "Ada T Lim" at Jun 18, 97 04:23:10 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Anyhow, what would be a good way to implement 'setuid libraries'? (The idea > being that all function calls to this library have an implicit setuid(0) first > and a setuid() back afterwards. You mean "installed images". Generally a "system" priviledge level jammed in between "user" and "kernel". On an Intel, this probably means "ring 1" (kernel is "ring 0" and user is "ring 3"). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199706181712.KAA20993>